How to motivate employees when their priorities have changed

 

 

 

 

 

by Kristi Hedges

 

 

Get into a conversation with a company leader these days, and you’ll likely hear some version of “no one wants to work hard anymore.” Those companies who are hiring still seek hungry, ambitious hard-chargers who will do what it takes to succeed. But new hires come in negotiating like seasoned executives, leaving managers flummoxed. Even with recent rounds of layoffs, employee expectations are staying high, as job ads emphasizing flexibility and other benefits attest. There’s also a truism that transcends economic situations: Companies want to hire and retain the best people, which gives the best people leverage. I see my C-suite clients grasping for more control to get back to “normal” by pushing for longer hours in the office, tightening metrics, and hoping that economic headwinds will return their power.

I tell them not to count on it.

Human nature hasn’t fundamentally changed. People want to be engaged at work and apply themselves to big things. But just like a camera lens zooming out, we now see there’s more to the story. Feeling passionate about our working life — liking what we do and how we do it — is as important as ever, but what creates that passion has broadened and deepened. We no longer see a singular pursuit of a corporate goal in a bustling office as the only way to a purposeful career. Leaders need to catch up or they’ll be operating frustratingly empty hybrid offices with quiet-quitters and short-timers. (more…)

Beyond Salary and Benefits: Why Career Conversations Matter

 

 

 

 

by Winne Jiang, Claire Harbour, Antoine Tirard

 

 

 

Meaningful discussions between managers and employees build stronger individuals and organisations.

A simultaneous surge of mass layoffs and unprecedented job growth in the United States has created a confusing, complex climate for companiesIn such a paradoxical environment, organisations should seize the opportunity to retain talent instead of falling into a cycle of continuous turnover. By holding onto valuable employees and building on their skills and abilities, companies can create an environment of mutual success, leading to enhanced value for the organisation.

Having career conversations with managers, in addition to formal performance reviews, is an effective way to ensure that employees feel valued, motivated and committed. A study from Right Management found that almost 90 percent of employees believe that they are, or should be, responsible for their career development, and two-thirds of individual performance drivers are tied to career conversations.

Regular, meaningful discussions between employees and their managers or mentors can help foster a fulfilling work experience for both parties. Through these conversations, leaders can gain a better understanding of their employees’ core aspirations and help them plan their career and life trajectories more effectively. Managers can also derive a strong sense of fulfilment from understanding and developing others.

Career conversations are seldom incorporated into the mandatory talent management cycle. Non-HR executives may find the constant demand for formal evaluations and salary reviews to be burdensome enough. But a well-handled conversation is a powerful tool that benefits not only the company in terms of engagement and retention, but also the individual’s overall development and transformation. A single conversation can change an entire career path. (more…)

HR’s problem isn’t capability—it’s capacity

 

 

 

 

by Mark Stelzner

 

 

 

The past eight months have been brutal for layoffs, particularly in the tech sector. Every day brings another announcement, with thousands of workers facing unemployment under the dark cloud of economic uncertainty. Threaded within these announcements are stories of companies behaving badly, whether it’s the methodology of the layoff or leadership taunting the recently unemployed. We can all agree that it’s hard enough to find out you’re losing your job, let alone compound the pain by removing dignity from the process.

While layoffs often appear to come out of the blue, the reality is that, for most organizations, there have been weeks of planning behind the scenes. This is particularly true if the organization falls under the jurisdiction of the WARN Act, Works Councils, collective bargaining agreements, or other legislative and regulatory requirements. Much of the layoff preparatory work falls on the shoulders of the thinly stretched HR function, which is often targeted by headcount reductions itself.

Despite what people might think, HR’s role in the decision-making process can be more administrative than strategic. HR professionals are often brought into the fold only by signing specific non-disclosure agreements, and this usually happens well after the business leaders have made their key choices. HR then typically scrambles to validate that the process was appropriate, often finding a litany of late-stage issues impacting the targeted employees. HR may then cull through performance and potential data, but bad input can certainly lead to equally bad outcomes. And when it’s time to share the difficult realities with your people, managers and leadership often cede accountability out of risk mitigation, electing language within the termination notice such as, “You’ll hear from your HR partner in the next [hours/days] to explain the process and answer any questions.” This is likely to funnel all the angst, shock, anger and outright distress of the displaced directly into the overworked and unstaffed arms of the people function.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

Unlike nearly every article that’s been published in this industry, I firmly believe HR business partners (HRBPs) are, in fact, strategic. From my vantage point, the issue at hand has much more to do with capacity than capability. I recently presented to the HR business partnering community at the one of the largest sportswear brands in the world, and here’s what I told them.

HR in the spotlight (more…)

The Technologies Senior Leaders Plan to Deploy in the Coming Years

by Andrew Shipilov

Cloud computing is expected to take a back seat to AI, big data analytics and blockchain.

Despite all the hype, augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality, blockchain and 3D printing have had a small impact on businesses in the last few years. Big data analytics has had the biggest impact, according to a survey I conducted with my colleague Nathan Furr of 317 INSEAD MBA alumni and participants in our Executive Education programmes. Our respondents were mostly senior executives and around 50 percent of them worked in large companies.

Big data analytics, cloud and machine learning have all had a significant impact on business in the past two years. Big data analytics seems to have changed almost all business areas (creation of new revenues, core business protection, improvements in operational efficiency, new customer acquisition, increased retention and loyalty of existing customers). Cloud computing primarily helped improve operational efficiency.

(more…)

Senior Director, GBS Service Center Lead (Latin America)

  • The Latin America Service Center Lead is responsible of the overall GBS center operations and the process delivery
  • He/she is responsible for managing all KPls and SLAs within the captive center (including Customer Experience metrics)
  • Also responsible to drive a Continuous Improvement culture in the center to provide benefits to the business
  • Supervises: LA Operations Director, LA RTR Director, HTR Director, LA Transformation/Projects Office, LA Internal Control Manager and Customer Experience Manager
  • Staff Size: 300-500
  • Service catalog covers 30+
  • Scope: Latin America mainly with some sub-processes running through Americas/globally

Responsibilities

  • Develops, leads and manages regional GBS organization
  • Assures quality and timeliness of service delivery
  • Ensures that results are in accordance with agreed metrics and the operating plan
    • Builds quality systems into all production process
    • Executes against GBS operational objectives
    • Engages with clients to ensure the process and deliverables are aligned to their needs
    • Enhances the process & services by implementing Continuous Improvement initiatives

Manages resources and work environment of captive center

  • Allocates resources based on demand
  • Identifies, implements and manages process and facilities modifications
  • Creates culture of GBS mission in Center
  • Owns Captive center cost and pipeline

Please let me know if you could be interested or might know someone who might be.

Thank you.

Larry Janis I Managing Partner I Integrated Search Solutions Group

P-516-767-3030 I C-516-445-2377

 ISSG I Twitter I LinkedIn